Practical insights on retirement, taxes, investing, and equity compensation - written by our advisors, for real people.
When to claim Social Security is one of the most consequential financial decisions you'll make in retirement. Yet most people spend less than an hour on it. Here's what the research actually says - and why waiting usually wins.
Read Article →Medicare surcharges can be a costly surprise for high earners. Most people don't see it coming.
One bad year early in retirement can permanently alter your financial trajectory. Here's how to think about it.
When your investment manager, tax advisor, and planner aren't talking to each other, the gaps between them cost you.
When to claim Social Security is one of the most consequential financial decisions you'll make in retirement. Yet most people spend less than an hour on it. Here's what the research says - and why waiting usually wins.
You can claim Social Security as early as age 62 or as late as 70. Every year you wait past your Full Retirement Age (FRA), your benefit grows by 8%. That's a guaranteed, inflation-adjusted 8% return - virtually impossible to replicate in the market with comparable certainty.
The most common reason people claim early is fear: fear the program will run dry, fear they'll die before they break even, fear of leaving money on the table. Most of these fears are overstated. The break-even point for waiting is typically around age 80 - and most Americans live well past that.
For married couples, the coordination of claiming strategies can add hundreds of thousands in lifetime income. The optimal strategy depends on both spouses' benefit amounts, ages, and health - and it's almost never the one that feels most intuitive.
For many retirees, the years between leaving work and the start of Required Minimum Distributions represent the single greatest tax planning opportunity of their financial lives. Here's why - and how to use it.
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA or 401(k) into a Roth IRA. You pay taxes on the amount converted now - but that money grows tax-free and is never subject to RMDs. The question is: at what tax rate are you converting?
When you retire, your taxable income often drops significantly. Social Security may not yet be taxed. RMDs haven't started. This window - often between ages 60 and 73 - is frequently the lowest-tax period of a high earner's life. Converting during this window means paying tax at a lower rate than you would have during your working years or during forced RMDs.
If you work at a tech company, your RSUs are almost certainly your single largest source of wealth accumulation - and your single largest tax liability. Most tech employees have no plan. Here's a simple framework.
When RSUs vest, the value is treated as ordinary income - taxed at your marginal rate. This happens whether you sell or not. By the time you see the shares in your account, the tax is already owed. The decision you need to make is what to do next.
Most tech employees who hold their shares accumulate significant concentration in a single stock. This is a risk management problem, not just a tax problem. The optimal strategy depends on your conviction in the company, your overall financial picture, and your tax situation - not just what feels right.
These are two of the most important (and most misunderstood) terms in financial services. Here's the plain-English version.
A fiduciary is legally required to act in your best interest. This sounds obvious, but most financial professionals are held to a lower standard - suitability - meaning they only have to recommend products that are "suitable" for you, not the best option available.
Fee-only advisors are compensated entirely by client fees - not commissions on products they sell. This eliminates the single largest source of conflict of interest in financial advice. When we make a recommendation, we're not compensated differently based on what you choose.
The Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA) is a Medicare surcharge that most high earners have never heard of - until they get the bill. Here's how it works and what you can do about it.
IRMAA increases your Medicare Part B and D premiums based on your income from two years prior. If your income exceeds certain thresholds, you pay more - significantly more at the top brackets. The surcharges can add $4,000–$10,000+ per year for a couple.
Because IRMAA is based on income from two years ago, a large Roth conversion, a business sale, or an unusual income event in one year can trigger IRMAA surcharges two years later - often as a complete surprise. Understanding this dynamic is essential to retirement income planning.
It's not just about how much your portfolio earns on average - it's about when it earns it. The order of returns matters enormously in retirement.
If you experience a severe market downturn in the early years of retirement - while you're taking withdrawals - you permanently reduce your portfolio's ability to recover. You're selling low and locking in losses. The same average return in a different sequence can produce very different outcomes.
Sequence risk is managed through asset allocation, withdrawal flexibility, maintaining a cash buffer, and tactical income strategies - not by trying to time the market. The goal is to avoid being forced to sell equities during downturns.
Most people assume that having multiple professionals managing their finances is a sign of sophistication. Often, it's a source of costly gaps.
Your investment manager doesn't know your tax rate. Your CPA doesn't know your portfolio allocation. Your estate attorney has never seen your beneficiary designations. Each professional is optimizing their piece - with no one looking at the whole picture.
Tax-loss harvesting that isn't coordinated with realized gains. Roth conversions that accidentally push you into a higher IRMAA bracket. An estate plan that's contradicted by your beneficiary designations. These aren't hypotheticals - they're things we find in almost every new client relationship.